
Reading with Babies, Toddlers, and Twos by Susan Straub and KJ Dell'Antonia.
You all probably know me well enough by now to realize that I'm sort of an asshole about some things. Literature, for one. I'm a book snob, prone to snide remarks about Oprah selections (and horror when a beloved book -- say, Wally Lamb's She's Come Undone or Steinbeck's East of Eden -- shows up in the New Paperbacks section sporting that damn O). Oh, sure, I might sneak a Jean M. Auel novel once in a while, but I have the good sense to hide it under the bathroom sink in shame. This petty snobbery extends to children's literature, especially since I grew up reading my mother's scavenged 1940s Childcraft series, full of quality poetry and weird postwar childrearing advice. (There was also a set from the 1960s, of which my favorite volume was Guide for Parents because of its full-color photographs of various infectious rashes and how to know them. Which is probably why the prospect of measles or mumps doesn't faze me; I grew up thinking that of course they were a normal part of childhood, despite the fact that neither I nor anyone I knew ever seemed to contract them.)
In that uppity spirit did I open this "Guide to Choosing, Reading and Loving Books Together". I figured, hell, what could some book tell me what I didn't already know about children's books? Yeah, sure, nice for people who didn't know much about it, but me...and then I'd trail off, distracted by that guest on Dr. Phil who didn't love her unattractive daughter as much as the beautiful one. (You see how my highfalutinicity don't necessarily translate to action.)
I was thrilled and slightly deflated to discover that it is actually a very useful little book, easy to page through but equally suited to more in-depth reading. There's a smattering of theory: why to read, how to do it to keep the littles engaged, how stories work and how children learn to interpret the visual world, as well as notes on developmental stages and what type of books or reading techniques might work well at those times. Rather than breaking suggestions down by chronological age, they are (wisely) divided into stages like Heads Up, Cruising/Walking, and Talking.
Book recommendations are frequent and offered topically as well as by stage; there are books about color, books about shape, books about feelings and bedtime and common toddler obsessions. I have to give credit, too: these are quality book recommendations. I recognize enough of them to trust the ones I haven't read yet, and I'll definitely use this book as a starting point for adding to our (tiny, chewed-by-a-single-tooth) library. There are also a few featured books with capsule reviews, and mini-interviews with featured authors and artists. From a layout standpoint, and this is important to me after years of doing actual paste-ups of a college paper whose managing editor aspired to employment at Raygun, this book is awesome. Easy-to-read fonts, judicious use of bolding, shaded boxes for different things (but the layout of the boxes is consistent -- kids' top ten lists all look the same, featured author boxes all look the same!), and (joy!) an index of booklists in the back make this a layout nerd's dream book. Seriously. It's what design ought to be: thoughtful, useful, and unobtrusive.
(At this point I should tell you that all I got out of the deal was a free copy of the book. No wining and dining, no squirtgun pressed against my spine: it's an honest assessment. I just really, really liked the book. Ha ha! I got it free!)
My only criticism is of the chapter on television. I know, I know, that stuff is so ubiquitous these days, kind of like particulate matter pollution, and there are so many crossovers from books to television (and, less felicitously, TV to books). But was it really necessary to taint the sacrosanct world of the printed word with TeeVee? Am I just a crotchety bastard? Is it just a question of aesthetics?
Well, no. While I agree that "No one is going to die if you plop the kid down in front of Noggin to take a breather," I felt my adrenal glands kick into high gear when I read about how kids really do learn from TV. The bulk of the research on that subject demonstrates that learning from TV is much less robust than experiential learning. I mean it's one thing to admit most of us use TV from time to time, but to attribute benefit...eh. To the authors' credit, they approach the issue sensibly, with lots of discussion of how to minimize television time, limit the effects of commercials, and why Baby Einstein is a pale imitation the real thing.
It's a small enough quibble that it doesn't affect my overall assessment of the book. Which is positive. It's designed cleverly enough that I'm sure I'll refer to it in the future, when I need a suggestion for a book about big-girl beds, or when I want Dr. Seuss deconstructed (for real!).
And I won't have to hide it behind the spare toilet paper.